I have a cosmological post brewing, so I thought I would touch on a slightly different topic, namely the question of "could physics predict a giraffe?" The following has the usual "buyer beware" clauses; I am a physicist, an astrophysicist at that, and not a chemist, or a biologist, and definitely no a philosopher of science, although I may end up annoying all of them. To start with, let's look at the subject, to wit, a giraffe. The reason for the post is because of an article over at The Curious Wavefunction titled Why biology (and chemistry) is not physics. The basic argument is this; Physics is a fundamental science, and identified the basic workings of the Universe. How do nuclei hold themselves together, how does the Universe expand, why do electrons flow through conductors etc etc. That's physics. Now, physics is "reductionist", in that all complex processes can be broken down into a the application of relatively simple underlying phy
Geraint, I hope I'm understanding this correctly. Is the main "surprise" in this research, that the dwarf galaxies are rotating toward and away from us? If this is correct, wouldn't any object large or small that becomes part of a greater entity (a galaxy)be held by gravity and therefore orbit around the core, in varying distances?
ReplyDeleteHi John - the surprise is that there is ordered rotation in the population, so this subset of dwarfs is orbiting like the planets of the solar system, rather than the long-term comets, which are at any angle. The latter is what we would expect for the dwarf population.
DeleteAre they orbiting an "unseen" centre?..or are they orbiting each other (in a planetary motion) due to the gravitational effect they have on each other?
ReplyDeleteThe main force the dwarf will feel will be from the Andromeda galaxy, and the dark matter halo in which they reside. The force from each other is relatively small, unless they get close together.
Delete