The challenge of the modern scientist is to avoid career suicide

A new article in The Conversation called The Challenge of the Modern Scientist is to Avoid Career Suicide.

Happy to discuss this in more detail below
Location: Sydney NSW, Australia

Comments

  1. Brendon J. Brewer27 February 2014 at 09:08

    Personally, this "big science" idea doesn't appeal to me at all. I'd much rather potter away in a corner on my own things. Which require me to program well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cusp27 February 2014 at 15:52

      But you have big science papers - with monitoring of quasars for reverberation mapping!

      Delete
    2. Brendon J. Brewer27 February 2014 at 17:52

      Touche. :) They aren't the ones that I identify myself with, but they are some of the most cited.

      Delete
    3. Cusp27 February 2014 at 18:21

      Ah! So, you outsource your Big Science! :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Falling into a black hole: Just what do you see?

Image
Everyone loves black holes. Immense gravity, a one-way space-time membrane, the possibility of links to other universes. All lovely stuff. A little trawl of the internets reveals an awful lot of web pages discussing black holes, and discussions about spaghettification, firewalls, lost information, and many other things. Actually, a lot of the stuff out there on the web is nonsense, hand-waving, partly informed guesswork. And one of the questions that gets asked is "What would you see looking out into the universe?" Some (incorrectly) say that you would never cross the event horizon, a significant mis-understanding of the coordinates of relativity. Other (incorrectly) conclude from this that you actually see the entire future history of the universe play out in front of your eyes. What we have to remember, of course, is that relativity is a mathematical theory, and instead of hand waving, we can use mathematics to work out what we will see. And that's what I did.
Read more

The masses of Local Group dwarf spheroidal galaxies: Not too small after all?

Image
After a week of battling jet-lag, it's time to get back to some science. And this week, a new paper from the PAndAS , from Heidelberg based researcher,   Michelle Collins . The target here is  dwarf galaxies . Here's one from wikipedia. There's lots of dwarf galaxies out there in the Universe. In fact, in terms of number, they represent the dominant galaxies out there, but they are much smaller than our own Milky Way, so they don't have the dominant mass. Don't believe me? Well, my colleague,  Alan McConnachie , recently compiled the most comprehensive compilation of the galaxies within our  Local Group ; you can read the details  here.  So, we have three large galaxies, the Milky Way, Andromeda and  Triangulum , and then almost 100 smaller galaxies, a sea of dwarf galaxies. Now, you might think that dwarfs are simple things, just a billion or so stars living together in a dark matter halo, just a smaller version of large galaxies, but no. There are a numb
Read more

How many tanks?

Image
The German tank problem is a fav of mine. The wikipedia page on it is a little long winded, but I think it can be looked at a lot faster with a little numerical mucking about. The problem is quite simple. The enemy are producing tanks, and each has a sequential serial number (for simplicity, let's assume that the numbers are reset every month). You encounter this scene on the battle field; and we see that this is tank number, say, 15 of a particular months production. How many tanks were produced in that month? Can we even answer the question? This is the problem that faced the Allies in WWII; you really wanted to know how many panzers are out there. Intelligence officers were reporting productions of more than a 1000 tanks per month, but based on statistics, the predicted number was significantly fewer than that, in the hundreds. After the war, the numbers were checked against records and the statistical answer was amazingly correct (read the wikipedia page for more detail
Read more