Showing posts from June, 2012

112 Mercer St

I'm in Brooklyn, on my way back to Sydney after a meeting in Princeton. I'll mention the meeting a little more below, but when in Princeton, all those with an interest in physics should make a little pilgrimage to a small while house just off to the side of campus. It's address is 112 Mercer St.  The house is interesting as it is where Einstein lived from 1936 until his death in 1955. Einstein's office was not on the main university campus (which is a rather beautiful and surreal place) but at the  Institute for Advanced Studies which is just a little further down Mercer St. Einstein's house is a pretty little wood house on a street of pretty wood houses, and doesn't stand out too much. Interestingly, Einstein did not want the house turned into a museum, and so it is still a private residence, with the current householder being  Eric Maskin who, while not being a physicist, holds a Nobel Prize (in Economics). Just to reinforce that this is not museum, a

"Statistical thinking will one day be as necessary...

... for efficient citizenship as the ability to read and write.” H. G. Wells A very quick post today, as things are busy (more about that in a little while), but seeing the above quote at Steinn SigurĂ°sson " Dynamics of Cats " blog reminded me about something about physics education (and science in general). I've mentioned before about my thoughts on physics education. Traditionally, this is split into two separate bits, the analytic mathematically bits in lectures, and laboratory work. People who do more of one than the other label themselves are theoreticians or experimenters. They are portrayed as living in different worlds. The problem is that this completely misrepresents science. Science is the interface between these two, it is an extremely vital component, and we do an extremely poor job of highlighting how important this is. Just what do mean? Well, let's take a simple example. Suppose someone calculated the scattering of Sun light as it comes throug

The Physics of "Rendezvous with Rama"

While I read science fiction, I don't read a lot of it. I prefer history books (and while the 6th June was focused on the transit of Venus, it is famous for another big historical event ). I'm not a fan of "magic" science fiction, where the equivalent of a magic wand is waved, with some pseudo-scientific gobbledygook, to fix a problem. So, I am going to talk about a book that doesn't, namely Rendezvous with Rama by Arthur C. Clarke . I'll start with two confessions. Firstly, I don't really like a lot of Clarke's work. And second, I didn't actually read the book; I had it read to me. To explain the latter statement, way-back-when I worked for the Anglo-Australian Observatory . Like virtually all support astronomers (those who show astronomers observing with the telescope the ropes) I lived in Sydney, but one week in five I had to travel to the telescope, a 5-6 hour drive. So I used audio books to maintain my sanity. And one of them was Rende

There's more to being an astronomer than doing astronomy

Back in Sydney after a couple of nights in the lovely Port Stephens, in the town of Shoal Bay at the ASA Early Career Research Workshop. Here's the grey sky as seen from my hotel room (it may be grey, but it's a lovely place). I should point out, with 17 years under my belt since my PhD, and being a professor at a large university, I am not an Early Career Researcher, and so I was there as a grown-up, providing advice and live stories. I spoke on the topic of networking, something that sounds horribly business-world-like, but is an important aspect of establishing a career. There were a lot of postdocs there, many recently out of their PhD, but a few in their third postdoc, all with the question of "How do we get that career in astronomy?" The discussions were frank and honest - the room was told that it is a 100% certainty that they all will not have a job in astronomy in the future - and I think the postdocs appreciated this honesty. I'll come back to t