London verses Sydney

This week has been horribly busy (for a number of reasons that will become apparent in the next couple of weeks), and this afternoon I am jumping on a plane to a conference on dwarf galaxies. The main reason for the conference is to give us a chance to celebrate the 60th birthday of astronomer
extraordinaire, Mike Irwin. I'll write more about this once I get back.

So, today, a quicky. I've spent the last 13 years living in Sydney, but did spend 3 years as an undergraduate in London. I was recently wondering about the relative sizes of the two, and wikipedia tells us that Sydney has a population of about 4.6 million, whereas London has a staggeringly accurate 8,308,369 residents (and bizarrely, this is a prime number). So, in terms of people, London is very roughly twice as large.

What about land area? Well, I saw this on a British Expats site recently
Possibly 20 times larger? I know London does feel large, but Sydney is no provincial town.

So, I decided to look, and found a nice website that let's you plot two maps on one scale. And here's you go

Now we have the question, just how big is a city? Cities have official boundaries, but these don't always correspond to density of people or houses etc. 

For London, we can take the concept of Greater London. This is approximately the land within the M25 motorway (but only approximately). From wikipedia, we can see that this looks like this
although there a lots of people not quite in London, living around the edge.

What about Sydney? Well Sydney does have a "Metropolitan Area"(although it doesn't seem to have too rigid a set of boundaries. In terms of local government, it looks like this.
But these only tell part of the story. Perhaps it's better to look at the map of the train network, and what trains are "suburban" as opposed to being intercity.

So, looking at our map of Sydney, it stretches from Penrith in the west, to the "city" in the east, Campbelltown in the south to Berowra in the north. Those dimensions are not dissimilar to the extent of London!

But again, that's not the entire story. It helps to look at the cities in terms of distribution of housing.
 Sydney has a lot of green! The link out to the west, through Plumpton and St Marys to Penrith is bounded by fields and farm land. Up in the north, there I live, the suburbs are intertwined with bushland. 

But there is no doubting the fact that London clearly is not 20 times the size of Sydney, although having lived there, and filed on to packed trains with millions of other people, I know that it can feel that way. Maybe a factor of two?  

And just to wrap up, here's Sydney compared to New York
and Cardiff (well, actually a large chunk of Old South Wales)
I could go on comparing places for ever, but have just remembered that I have a plane to catch!
Location: Sydney NSW, Australia

Comments

  1. Brendon J. Brewer28 July 2013 at 18:38

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brendon J. Brewer28 July 2013 at 18:39

    Cool. I want to compare Sydney with Auckland now. We just had a weekend skiing and stayed in the town of Ohakune, whose local paper amusingly quoted someone saying Auckland was an "oversized metropolis". :-/

    ReplyDelete
  3. pp6546812 August 2013 at 04:03

    Hi there

    Since you know both cities, could you tell me which Sydney area is most like West Hampstead in London? Many thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cusp29 August 2013 at 18:38

      Tricky one - Hunters Hill maybe - old and established suburb (although if my memory serves me well, it used to have a uranium smelter, which is something I don't remember in Hampstead....)

      Delete
    2. Tom Hall7 August 2016 at 19:00

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Tom Hall7 August 2016 at 19:01

      Annandale, small village like area of the inner-west of Sydney

      Delete
  4. Ggreybeard25 August 2013 at 11:20

    An interesting experiment, Geraint - but the conclusion is still vague and as with all scientific experiments, improved data is required!
    :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cusp29 August 2013 at 18:39

      While the size of the cities may be similar, the museums are of completely different scale. I could get lost in the Natural History and Science Museums in London for days and days. My kids generally leg it around the typical Australian museum in 20 minutes :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Falling into a black hole: Just what do you see?

Image
Everyone loves black holes. Immense gravity, a one-way space-time membrane, the possibility of links to other universes. All lovely stuff. A little trawl of the internets reveals an awful lot of web pages discussing black holes, and discussions about spaghettification, firewalls, lost information, and many other things. Actually, a lot of the stuff out there on the web is nonsense, hand-waving, partly informed guesswork. And one of the questions that gets asked is "What would you see looking out into the universe?" Some (incorrectly) say that you would never cross the event horizon, a significant mis-understanding of the coordinates of relativity. Other (incorrectly) conclude from this that you actually see the entire future history of the universe play out in front of your eyes. What we have to remember, of course, is that relativity is a mathematical theory, and instead of hand waving, we can use mathematics to work out what we will see. And that's what I did. ...
Read more

Journey to the Far-Side of the Sun

Image
There was a movie, in the old days, Journey to the Far-Side of the Sun  (also known as Doppleganger) which (spoiler alert) posits that there is a mirror version of the Earth hidden on the other side of the Sun, sharing the orbit with our Earth. The idea is that this planet would always be hidden behind the Sun, and so we would not know it there there. This idea comes up a lot, over and over again. In fact, it came up again last week on twitter. But there's a problem. It assumes the Earth is on a circular orbit. I won't go into the details here, but one of the greatest insights in astronomy was the discovery of Kepler's laws of planetary motion , telling us that planets move on elliptical orbits. With this, there was the realisation that planets can't move at uniform speeds, but travel quickly when closer to the Sun, while slowing down as their orbits carry them to larger distance.  There has been a lot of work examining orbits in the Solar System, and you can  s...
Read more

Moving Charges and Magnetic Fields

Image
Still struggling with grant writing season, so another post which has resulted in my random musings about the Universe (which actually happens quite a lot). In second semester, I am teaching  electricity and magnetism to our First Year Advanced Class . I really enjoy teaching this class as the kids are on the ball and can ask some deep and meaningful questions. But the course is not ideal. Why? Because we teach from a textbook and the problem is that virtually all modern text books are almost the same. Science is trotted out in an almost historical progression. But it does not have to be taught that way. In fact, it would be great if we could start with  Hamiltonian and Lagrangian  approaches, and derive physics from a top down approach. We're told that it's mathematically too challenging, but it really isn't. In fact, I would start with a book like  The Theoretical Minimum , not some multicoloured compendium of physics. We have to work with what we have! ...
Read more