Was I ever really away?

I'm back in Sydney after a holiday out in the Pacific. It was a good week, with warm weather providing a nice escape from the chill in Sydney (it does get cold here, and the notion of insulation appears to be beyond Australian house builders). I won't harp on about the holiday, but here's a picture of me snapped by my wife.
It should not take a detective to work out where I went, (and sorry to Bryan for sporting a CAASTRO shirt while not actually a member). But also note that I am on my phone, and I am dealing with work issues (both research and admin), while enjoying a tusker.

I wrote a little about this a while ago when I attended the Early Career Research meeting, and the notion of work-life balance.

For me, I don't separate the two. I don't have work over here and life over there, and battle to keep them separate. I just have one large amorphous blob of life, and all aspects are intermingled. This reflects the comments by Kate Brooks on the topic.

What I learnt at the ECR meeting is that some people seriously frown upon such an approach, and that there must clearly be a break between work and life (and that they sometimes battle to keep these separate).

Sorry, but that does not work for me. Research is fun, interesting and is always on my mind. I can happily sit by the side of the pool and think about measuring the properties of dark matter. Sure, the university side of things has stuff to do which is not fun, but is par of the course, and so to keep doing my research, I am happy to plod along with the "admin"-side of things.

Is my life diminished because I don't separate work and life? I don't think so. I think my life is pretty good with lots of fun activities with my children etc. Not sure where this post is going, so I am going to wrap up and take mini-me to rugby. As ever, I will not be really away :)
Location: Sydney NSW, Australia

Comments

  1. Anonymous16 July 2012 at 07:56

    Geraint, your "work" is not work (apart from the admin duties)it's a "passion"..a very strong emotion!..that's why you cannot separate work and family.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous16 July 2012 at 07:58

    Do you have a Macarthur Astronomical Society shirt?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cusp16 July 2012 at 08:01

    Nope I don't have a Macarthur Society shirt, although I do have a couple of coffee mugs that I use at work :)

    Perhaps I could start a new craze of wearing astronomical shirts in exotic places?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous17 July 2012 at 23:25

    I'll see what I can do. That would be a great idea...do you charge for the exposure?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cusp19 July 2012 at 08:20

    Nope, free advertising :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Falling into a black hole: Just what do you see?

Image
Everyone loves black holes. Immense gravity, a one-way space-time membrane, the possibility of links to other universes. All lovely stuff. A little trawl of the internets reveals an awful lot of web pages discussing black holes, and discussions about spaghettification, firewalls, lost information, and many other things. Actually, a lot of the stuff out there on the web is nonsense, hand-waving, partly informed guesswork. And one of the questions that gets asked is "What would you see looking out into the universe?" Some (incorrectly) say that you would never cross the event horizon, a significant mis-understanding of the coordinates of relativity. Other (incorrectly) conclude from this that you actually see the entire future history of the universe play out in front of your eyes. What we have to remember, of course, is that relativity is a mathematical theory, and instead of hand waving, we can use mathematics to work out what we will see. And that's what I did. ...
Read more

Journey to the Far-Side of the Sun

Image
There was a movie, in the old days, Journey to the Far-Side of the Sun  (also known as Doppleganger) which (spoiler alert) posits that there is a mirror version of the Earth hidden on the other side of the Sun, sharing the orbit with our Earth. The idea is that this planet would always be hidden behind the Sun, and so we would not know it there there. This idea comes up a lot, over and over again. In fact, it came up again last week on twitter. But there's a problem. It assumes the Earth is on a circular orbit. I won't go into the details here, but one of the greatest insights in astronomy was the discovery of Kepler's laws of planetary motion , telling us that planets move on elliptical orbits. With this, there was the realisation that planets can't move at uniform speeds, but travel quickly when closer to the Sun, while slowing down as their orbits carry them to larger distance.  There has been a lot of work examining orbits in the Solar System, and you can  s...
Read more

Moving Charges and Magnetic Fields

Image
Still struggling with grant writing season, so another post which has resulted in my random musings about the Universe (which actually happens quite a lot). In second semester, I am teaching  electricity and magnetism to our First Year Advanced Class . I really enjoy teaching this class as the kids are on the ball and can ask some deep and meaningful questions. But the course is not ideal. Why? Because we teach from a textbook and the problem is that virtually all modern text books are almost the same. Science is trotted out in an almost historical progression. But it does not have to be taught that way. In fact, it would be great if we could start with  Hamiltonian and Lagrangian  approaches, and derive physics from a top down approach. We're told that it's mathematically too challenging, but it really isn't. In fact, I would start with a book like  The Theoretical Minimum , not some multicoloured compendium of physics. We have to work with what we have! ...
Read more